McLaren’s dominance in testing shakes up the grid, but Red Bull and Mercedes won’t back down. F1 2025 is set for a thriller.
F1 2025 Pre-Season Analysis Table
| Team | Strengths | Weaknesses | Season Outlook |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren | Best race pace, consistent | Needs fine-tuning | Title contender |
| Mercedes | Stable, well-balanced | Unproven in heat | Top 3 potential |
| Ferrari | Potential speed, solid | Tire wear issues | Podium contender |
| Red Bull | Fast but unpredictable | Inconsistent handling | Fast but tricky |
| Williams | Strong single-lap pace | Long-run uncertainty | Midfield leader |
| Alpine | Big improvement, competitive | Still behind Williams | Fighting for P5 |
| Racing Bulls | Reliable, good potential | Slight understeer | Upper midfield |
| Haas | Solid but unclear ranking | Lacks one-lap pace | Lower midfield |
| Aston Martin | Better driveability | Rear instability | Backmarker struggles |
| Sauber | Struggles with handling | Too stiff, poor setup | Likely last place |
F1 2025: Who Dominated Pre-Season Testing & Who’s Got the Edge?
With pre-season testing wrapped up, the big question isn’t just who dominated, but also who’s really got the edge heading into the season?
Breaking Down the Competitive Landscape Ahead of the Season Opener
Three days, 3,896 laps completed under the Bahrain sun, yet the final verdict remains elusive. As always, teams and drivers stay cautious: “We’ll only really know where we stand in Melbourne qualifying.” But let’s be honest—they analyze every lap, every run, every data point. And so do we.
Without diving into pure speculation, here’s our take on the pecking order after pre-season testing. Spoiler alert: there are surprises.
Racing Bulls – A Serious Outsider
Red Bull’s sister team is far from a mere bystander. A well-rounded car, trouble-free mileage, and a strong driver duo. Yuki Tsunoda looks particularly comfortable. There’s still a slight understeer tendency, but if the team fine-tunes its setup, it could quickly become a regular contender for points each weekend.
Racing Bulls: Understeer, But Manageable
The Racing Bulls machine spent most of testing fighting understeer. Setup tweaks helped dial it back, but the front end always felt like it needed a bit more bite.
Rookie Isack Hadjar found it tough to get into a rhythm, which is fair, given the car’s limitations. Yuki Tsunoda handled it better—rarely looked out of control—but ideally, the team would want a little more front-end responsiveness to help with rotation and throttle application out of corners.
The good news? It’s stable and predictable, making it a solid midfield package.
Aston Martin – Some Promise, But Not Enough
There’s an improvement in driveability, but not enough to change the equation. The Aston remains a finicky car to handle, particularly on corner entry, where the rear lacks stability. Alonso expects a season start similar to late 2024, meaning a midfield outsider role.
Aston Martin: Consistent, But Not a Game-Changer
Aston Martin’s 2025 car feels like a refined version of last year’s—not revolutionary, but definitely improved.
The main issue? A slight rear instability that caused hesitation on turn-in. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it’s enough to cost confidence and lap time. Once in the corner, the car behaved well, but throttle application was sometimes delayed compared to rivals.
It’s good, just not groundbreaking.
Williams – A Team on the Rise
Williams surprised everyone by setting the fastest lap in Bahrain testing. A fluke? Not necessarily. The car seems well-designed, though some conditions may have played in its favor. Race pace is promising, and the team could well establish itself as the midfield leader this season.
Williams: Sharp and Responsive, A Midfield Dark Horse?
Williams rolled into testing with a car that looked ready to race. Straight out of the gate, it was driveable and responsive—though a little twitchy at times. As the team fine-tuned the setup, it became one of the most balanced midfield cars.
Watching at Turn 11, you could see the difference in rotation compared to the Racing Bulls. Alex Albon’s car was agile, sharp, and willing to change direction—exactly what you want for wheel-to-wheel battles. Williams might just be the surprise of the midfield this year.
Haas – Still Hard to Gauge
Just like last year, Haas focused on long runs with heavy fuel loads. That makes its true standing difficult to assess. The car appears stable, with solid race pace, but still lacks one-lap speed. If the team finds the right balance, it could target the upper midfield.
Haas: Playing the Long Game
Haas didn’t chase headlines in testing—they stuck to their plan. Heavy-fuel, long-run laps were the priority, making it tough to get a direct comparison with rivals. But what was clear? The car looks stable and consistent.
There were signs of understeer in slow corners, but nothing alarming. The DNA of last year’s solid machine seems to be intact, and with a driver lineup that knows how to extract pace, Haas might be in a decent place heading into the season.
Sauber – Struggles Continue
No need to sugarcoat it: Sauber is in trouble. Dead last in outright performance, and the on-track feel only worsens the picture. The car looks tricky, too stiff, and difficult to set up. Nico Hülkenberg didn’t hold back: “The baseline isn’t great.” For now, the Swiss team seems stuck at the back of the grid.
Sauber: Stiff, Tricky, and Off the Pace
Sauber’s test run was a rough ride from start to finish. The car looked stiff, unpredictable, and locked into a narrow setup window that didn’t leave much room for driver confidence. Early runs were straight-up painful—traction was nonexistent, and balance was nowhere to be found. Setup tweaks helped, but it still looked like the weakest car out there.
Nico Hülkenberg managed to extract some level of consistency, but the car’s limitations were glaring. Meanwhile, Gabriel Bortoleto had to wrestle it around the track, pushing it to the limit but never quite getting it to comply. Unless Sauber finds some magic in their setup, they could be in for a long season.
Alpine – A Major Improvement Over Last Year
A competitive Alpine is back. Far from the disaster of 2024, the French team is now at the front of the midfield, with performance close to Williams. Pierre Gasly and Jack Doohan are confident, and the overall trackside impression is positive. Alpine could be in the fight for fifth in the championship.
Alpine: Confidence on Tap
Pierre Gasly and Esteban Ocon had a car they could trust, and it showed. The Alpine turned in well, rotated smoothly, and had solid traction. It wasn’t as planted as the front-runners, but it looked like a car that could attack.
There were occasional moments of rear instability under braking for slower corners, but the team managed to iron that out. The big takeaway? It’s a car that should allow its drivers to push hard without eating up the tires too quickly—critical for race-day consistency.
Red Bull – A Top Team, But Vulnerable
The RB21 is quick but temperamental. Verstappen, rarely one for dramatics, looked far from comfortable. Balance issues, hesitation in direction changes—fast but not easy to exploit. If Red Bull unlocks its full potential, it will be the team to beat again. But for now, that remains uncertain.
Red Bull: Quick, But Not Quite Comfortable
Fast? Absolutely. Easy to drive? Not so much.
Early on, the RB21 looked like a well-balanced machine, but as the pace ramped up, so did its struggles with rotation. Max Verstappen, usually pinpoint-precise, had issues getting the car turned in at Turn 10 on day one. And on the final day, it wasn’t attacking Turn 4 with the same confidence as the frontrunners.
There were moments when it looked perfect, but too often, it felt slightly disconnected in balance, making throttle application tricky. It’s still Red Bull, so expect them to sort things out—but right now, they’ve got work to do.
Ferrari – Solid, But Not Enough
The Scuderia is in the mix but not as dominant as hoped. The car has potential but still lacks consistency. Between tire degradation issues and bouts of understeer, there’s work to be done. Nothing alarming, but certainly nothing to celebrate just yet.
Ferrari: Promising, But Not Yet Perfect
The Ferrari had flashes of brilliance, but it’s not quite dialed in.
At times, it looked razor-sharp—responsive and eager to turn in. Other times, understeer crept in, followed by the rear stepping out more than expected. It wasn’t a disaster, but there’s an inconsistency that needs sorting.
On the final day, disruptions meant we didn’t get a clear long-run picture, but the big question remains: can Ferrari smooth out the peaks and valleys in grip and balance? If they can, they’re in the fight. If not, they might be playing catch-up.
Mercedes – A Resurgence?
Mercedes appears to have finally found a stable and efficient machine. The car inspires confidence, particularly for George Russell, who described testing as “perfect.” Some doubts remain about how it will handle higher temperatures, but for now, things are looking good.
Mercedes: Smooth, Stable, and Serious
The W16 ran like clockwork throughout testing. From the first morning, it looked dialed in—well-balanced, predictable, and consistent.
Kimi Antonelli had a few rookie moments, but nothing too dramatic. Meanwhile, George Russell looked at home in the car, attacking corners with confidence.
Watching at Turn 10, where many struggled, the Mercedes was hooked in on the apex kerb just as well as the McLaren. That’s a sign of a car that’s working with its drivers, not against them.
The only question mark? A few too many front lock-ups. Maybe it’s just the track’s downhill braking zones, or maybe it’s something to watch for when the season starts.
McLaren – The Surprise Favorite
McLaren didn’t chase outright performance, but over long runs, it was untouchable. Its race pace is clearly the strongest on the grid. Some fine-tuning is still needed, but the orange team seems to have taken a step ahead. Red Bull and Mercedes will have to push hard to stay in the fight.
McLaren: Quick, But With a Wild Side
Lando Norris wasn’t exaggerating when he said the rear was lively—you could see it on track. The back end moved around, especially in the high-speed Turn 5-7 section.
But here’s the thing: sometimes, that’s a good thing. The rotation helped in slower corners, and overall, the car looked sharp and responsive from day one. While others lost that feeling as they locked in their setups, McLaren managed to keep it.
The big concern? Over a single lap in qualifying, that instability might be a problem. And over a race distance, it could chew through rear tires faster than ideal. But otherwise, this car looks like it’s ready to fight at the front.
Verdict: An Unpredictable Season Ahead
While testing provides an initial hierarchy, surprises are inevitable. McLaren looks to have taken the lead, but Red Bull could bounce back. Behind them, Mercedes and Ferrari remain close contenders. In the midfield, Williams, Alpine, and Racing Bulls are set for a fierce battle. At the back, Sauber and Aston Martin will have to fight hard to stay in touch.
One thing is certain: Melbourne will deliver an explosive first verdict.
- Discover More>F1 Set to Confirm Cadillac Entry for 2026 Without Delay
- Follow us on >Facebook and >Twitter for F1 updates
F1 2025: McLaren Leads, but Red Bull Faces a Fight F1 2025: McLaren Leads, but Red Bull Faces a Fight F1 2025: McLaren Leads, but Red Bull Faces a Fight F1 2025: McLaren Leads, but Red Bull Faces a Fight
